Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0dvsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest2,017 kg4,447 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk793 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,017kg4,447lb | 2,146kg4,731lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.5s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 855km532mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,747mm187in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,664mm66in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 793L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,842L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 192g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.5 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 300 hp 224 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 2,017 kg 4,447 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 6.4 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,017 kg 4,447 lb | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 855 km 532 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 192 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 793 L 28.0 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 129 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 479 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Has 10 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























