Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0dvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
2.0 P300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest2,017 kg4,447 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk793 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
- Most powerful301 hp224 kW
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 301hp224kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,017kg4,447lb | 2,076kg4,577lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.5s Calculated | 95.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,083km673mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,747mm187in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,664mm66in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,692mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 793L | 221L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,842L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 104L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.5 s | 95.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 301 hp 224 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has 1 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 2,017 kg 4,447 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 2,076 kg 4,577 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 6.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 7.3 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | 301 hp 224 kW | 7.3 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 301 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,017 kg 4,447 lb | 2,076 kg 4,577 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,083 km 673 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 793 L 28.0 cu ft | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 59 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 572 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
- Has 1 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























