Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0dvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020

3.0d

300 hp2996 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-present
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

2.0 P300

301 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,017 kg
    4,447 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    793 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
300hp224kW
301hp224kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,017kg4,447lb
2,076kg4,577lb
Gross weight-
3,000kg6,614lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
To 99% top speed
78.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
79.8s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
29.5s
Calculated
95.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,083km673mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,996cc183cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,747mm187in
4,879mm192in
Width
2,071mm82in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,664mm66in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,692mm67in
Rear track
1,656mm65in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
793L
221L
Max trunk volume
1,842L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
66L
104L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0dLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d4,000 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.5 s
95.2 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has 1 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2,017 kg
4,447 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
2,076 kg
4,577 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
201 km/h
125 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
301 hp
224 kW
7.3 s
201 km/h
125 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
793 L
28.0 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
301 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
301 hp
224 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
7.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
Lightness
2,017 kg
4,447 lb
2,076 kg
4,577 lb
Fuel consumption
-
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
793 L
28.0 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
-
1,083 km
673 mi
Trunk score
793 L
28.0 cu ft
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d

  • Has 250 Nm more
  • Is 59 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 572 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 2.0 P300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0d vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster