Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300vsAUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

2.0 P300

301 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2022
VS

AUDI e-tron

50 71 kWh

313 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Most powerful
    313 hp
    233 kW
  • Highest torque
    540 Nm
    398 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Power
301hp224kW
313hp233kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
540Nm398lb-ft
Curb weight
2,076kg4,577lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Gross weight
3,000kg6,614lb
3,040kg6,702lb
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Unrestricted
200 km/h124 mph
Restricted
190 km/h118 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
61.7s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
95.2s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,083km673mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
-
Length
4,879mm192in
4,901mm193in
Width
2,073mm82in
1,935mm76in
Height
1,803mm71in
1,632mm64in
Wheelbase
2,923mm115in
2,928mm115in
Front track
1,692mm67in
1,655mm65in
Rear track
1,686mm66in
1,652mm65in
Ground clearance
278mm11in
172mm7in
Trunk volume
221L
660L
Max trunk volume
1,686L
1,725L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
104L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
95.2 s
-
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Unrestricted
200 km/h124 mph
Restricted
190 km/h118 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
301 hp
224 kW
AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
313 hp
233 kW

AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh has 12 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 and AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
540 Nm
398 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
2,076 kg
4,577 lb
AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
2,370 kg
5,225 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
201 km/h
125 mph
AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Unrestricted
200 km/h124 mph
Restricted
190 km/h118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
301 hp
224 kW
7.3 s
201 km/h
125 mph
AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
313 hp
233 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
200 km/h124 mph
Restricted
190 km/h118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
301 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
200 km/h124 mph
Restricted
190 km/h118 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,901 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,632 mm
64.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Power
301 hp
224 kW
313 hp
233 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
6.8 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Unrestricted
200 km/h124 mph
Restricted
190 km/h118 mph
Lightness
2,076 kg
4,577 lb
2,370 kg
5,225 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,901 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,632 mm
64.3 in
Range score
1,083 km
673 mi
-
Trunk score
221 L
7.8 cu ft
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 439 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 2.0 P300
AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 vs AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster