Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0i

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    221 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,923kg4,239lb
1,897kg4,182lb
Gross weight
2,421kg5,337lb
-
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
79.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
39.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
938km583mi
Calculated
812km504mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,699mm185in
4,747mm187in
Width
1,882mm74in
-
Height
1,686mm66in
1,664mm66in
Wheelbase
2,789mm110in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,567mm62in
1,656mm65in
Ground clearance
197mm8in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
725L
793L
Max trunk volume
1,960L
1,842L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
82L
CO2 emissions
167g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIJaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0iPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
39.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
250 hp
186 kW

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i has 10 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,923 kg
4,239 lb
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
1,897 kg
4,182 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
221 km/h
137 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI6.9 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i7.3 s

Although Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 3.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
812 km
504 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.9 s
221 km/h
137 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
725 L
25.6 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,686 mm
66.4 in
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
793 L
28.0 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.9 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.3 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,923 kg
4,239 lb
1,897 kg
4,182 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
725 L
25.6 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,686 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
793 L
28.0 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in
Range score
938 km
583 mi
812 km
504 mi
CO2 score
167 g/km
-
Trunk score
725 L
25.6 cu ft
793 L
28.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIJaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km17.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi28.45 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,651 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 135 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 126 km (78 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 26 kg lighter
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 68 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0i
25t
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-Pace25t
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0i
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
45 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
2.0i
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI vs Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster