Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar
D 240 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,841 kg4,059 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,034 km643 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score91/100
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk793 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,897kg4,182lb | 1,841kg4,059lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 84.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.5s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 812km504mi Calculated | 1,034km643mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,747mm187in | 4,803mm189in |
| Height | 1,664mm66in | 1,665mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 793L | 673L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,842L | 1,731L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.5 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 1,897 kg 4,182 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 1,841 kg 4,059 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 812 km 504 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 1,034 km 643 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.3 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.3 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,897 kg 4,182 lb | 1,841 kg 4,059 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 812 km 504 mi | 1,034 km 643 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 793 L 28.0 cu ft | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i | Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 223 km (138 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























