Car comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

D 240 2.0

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,740 kg
    3,836 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    138 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    154 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,034 km
    643 mi
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDILand RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,841kg4,059lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
70.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
24.2s
Calculated
40.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
968km601mi
Calculated
1,034km643mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,486mm177in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,839mm72in
-
Height
1,673mm66in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,677mm105in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
615L
673L
Max trunk volume
1,655L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
154g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDILand Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.04,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDILand RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.2 s
40.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
1,841 kg
4,059 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI6.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.07.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
968 km
601 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
1,034 km
643 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.3 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDILand RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,841 kg
4,059 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
968 km
601 mi
1,034 km
643 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
154 g/km
Trunk score
615 L
21.7 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDILand Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Is 101 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 67 km (41 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 58 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
D 240 2.0
2.0 D240
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
D 240 2.0
2.0 D5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
D 240 2.0
2.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
D 240 2.0
300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
D 240 2.0
2.0 D5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 BiTDI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
D 240 2.0
Sport 2.0 T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster