Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200vsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,224 km761 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 96.0s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.6s Calculated | 60.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 1,224km761mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,595cc97cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,417mm174in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | - |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 5,300 rpm | 1,250-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.6 s | 60.4 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has 24 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 8.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 8.9 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 847 km 527 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,224 km 761 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.9 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 1,224 km 761 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 377 km (234 mi) more estimated range
- Has 229 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























