Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsJaguar F-Pace 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 20d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,706 kg3,761 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | JaguarF-Pace20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,706kg3,761lb | 1,845kg4,068lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 103.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 54.9s Calculated | 66.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 1,017km632mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | JaguarF-Pace20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 54.9 s | 66.8 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 136 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 20d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 20d and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.5 s |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Jaguar F-Pace 20d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 20d and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 783 km 486 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 1,017 km 632 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 9.0 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace20d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | JaguarF-Pace20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 1,017 km 632 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 | Jaguar F-Pace 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 139 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 20d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 234 km (146 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























