Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P300

300 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

2.0 P300

301 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,894 kg
    4,176 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
300hp224kW
301hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,894kg4,176lb
2,076kg4,577lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
3,000kg6,614lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
To 99% top speed
85.0s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
79.8s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
95.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
856km532mi
Calculated
1,083km673mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,984mm78in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,692mm67in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
1,234L
221L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
69L
104L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
95.2 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
301 hp
224 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has 1 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
2,076 kg
4,577 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
243 km/h
151 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
201 km/h
125 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3006.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P3007.3 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 has more power, Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
856 km
532 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
1,083 km
673 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
243 km/h
151 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
301 hp
224 kW
7.3 s
201 km/h
125 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
301 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
301 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
301 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
7.3 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
Lightness
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
2,076 kg
4,577 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
856 km
532 mi
1,083 km
673 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
-
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 P300
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km16.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi27.04 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,520 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Is 182 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 42 km/h (26 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 1,013 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 2.0 P300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P300
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 P300
530 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021530 V6
2.0 P300
30d V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
2.0 P300
530 TSI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300vsVolkswagenTalagon530 TSI V6
2.0 P300
3.0d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 P300
50 71 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300vsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
2.0 P300
50 TDI V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 P300
50 TFSI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300vsAUDIQ650 TFSI V6
2.0 P300
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 P300
2.0 T6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0 P300
2.0 T6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 P300
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 P300vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 P300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster