Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300vsLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
2.0 P290
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,894 kg4,176 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,894kg4,176lb | 1,961kg4,323lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 31.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 856km532mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,597mm181in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,727mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | 1,643mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 157L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | 1,651L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 31.1 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 1,894 kg 4,176 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 1,961 kg 4,323 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 6.4 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 856 km 532 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 290 hp 216 kW | 7.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,894 kg 4,176 lb | 1,961 kg 4,323 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 856 km 532 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 157 L 5.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 67 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1,077 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























