Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar E-Pace
2.0 P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions161 g/km
- Best estimated range968 km601 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score90/100
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,832kg4,039lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 968km601mi Calculated | 890km553mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,634mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 1,234L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 2,577L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 1,832 kg 4,039 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.0 s |
Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 968 km 601 mi |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 890 km 553 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,832 kg 4,039 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 968 km 601 mi | 890 km 553 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 107 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 78 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 619 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























