Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P250

250 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

D 240 2.0

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    1,832 kg
    4,039 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    154 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,034 km
    643 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
250hp186kW
240hp179kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,832kg4,039lb
1,841kg4,059lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
-
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
85.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
32.3s
Calculated
40.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
890km553mi
Calculated
1,034km643mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,984mm78in
-
Height
1,649mm65in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
1,234L
673L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
60L
CO2 emissions
174g/km
154g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2505,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.04,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.3 s
40.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
1,841 kg
4,059 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2507.0 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.07.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
890 km
553 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
1,034 km
643 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.3 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.0 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
1,841 kg
4,059 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
890 km
553 mi
1,034 km
643 mi
CO2 score
174 g/km
154 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 9 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 561 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

  • Has 135 Nm more
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 20 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
D 240 2.0
2.0 D240
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 P250
25t
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-Pace25t
D 240 2.0
2.0 D5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
D 240 2.0
300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
D 240 2.0
2.0 D5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 P250
2.0
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
D 240 2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 P250
45 TFSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
D 240 2.0
Sport 2.0 T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster