Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200vsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P200

200 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Fastest top speed
    216 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,757 kg
    3,874 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,757kg3,874lb
1,789kg3,944lb
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
211 km/h
131 mph
To 99% top speed
94.7s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
84.9s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
47.2s
Calculated
49.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
835km519mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,697mm185in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
192mm8in
Trunk volume
1,234L
270L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
2,005L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
69L
60L
CO2 emissions
186g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2005,500 rpm1,250 rpm5,750 rpm
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.2 s
49.6 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
211 km/h
131 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
1,789 kg
3,944 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
216 km/h
134 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
211 km/h
131 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2008.2 s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200: 0.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
200 hp
149 kW
8.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
211 km/h
131 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
7.8 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
211 km/h
131 mph
Lightness
1,757 kg
3,874 lb
1,789 kg
3,944 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
835 km
519 mi
-
CO2 score
186 g/km
-
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200

  • Is 32 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 964 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P200
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.0 P200
2.0d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 P200
20d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 TDI
2.0 GME
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
2.0 P200
40 TDI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
2.0 P200
2.0 TDI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 P200
2.0 T4
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.0 TDI
2.0 B4
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 P200
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P200vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P200 vs Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster