BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20dvsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20d | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,789kg3,944lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | - |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.8s Calculated | 49.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 2,005L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 3,600-4,100 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20d | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.8 s | 49.6 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 1,789 kg 3,944 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 7.7 s |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
Although Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI has more power, BMW X2 (F39) 20d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20d | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,789 kg 3,944 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Is 189 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























