Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2021
VS

Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    755 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    211 km/h
    131 mph
  • Lightest
    1,789 kg
    3,944 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    112 hp/t
    83 kW/t
    8.9 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
200hp149kW
204hp152kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,789kg3,944lb
1,951kg4,301lb
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
84.9s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
49.6s
Calculated
52.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
896km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,747mm187in
Width
1,882mm74in
-
Height
1,680mm66in
1,664mm66in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,656mm65in
Ground clearance
192mm8in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
270L
755L
Max trunk volume
2,005L
1,804L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIJaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
49.6 s
52.4 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
142 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
1,789 kg
3,944 lb
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
1,951 kg
4,301 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
211 km/h
131 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI7.8 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d8.0 s

Although Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
211 km/h
131 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
8.0 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.0 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,789 kg
3,944 lb
1,951 kg
4,301 lb
Fuel consumption
-
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in
Range score
-
896 km
556 mi
Trunk score
270 L
9.5 cu ft
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Is 162 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 485 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI vs Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster