Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Largest trunk755 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Lightest1,789 kg3,944 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,789kg3,944lb | 1,951kg4,301lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.6s Calculated | 52.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 896km556mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,747mm187in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | - |
| Height | 1,680mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,656mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 192mm8in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 270L | 755L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,005L | 1,804L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 3,600-4,100 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.6 s | 52.4 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 1,789 kg 3,944 lb |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 1,951 kg 4,301 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 8.0 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,789 kg 3,944 lb | 1,951 kg 4,301 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 896 km 556 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | 755 L 26.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Is 162 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 485 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























