Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsInfiniti QX70 3.7 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti QX70
3.7 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions186 g/km
- Best estimated range888 km551 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score85/100
Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6
- Lightest2,012 kg4,436 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,078kg4,581lb | 2,012kg4,436lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 83.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 17.4L/100 km13.5mpg US16.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 888km551mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 3,696cc226cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,865mm192in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,679mm66in | 1,640mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 368L | 410L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 293g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 2,012 kg 4,436 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6: 4.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 888 km 551 mi |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | InfinitiQX703.7 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 2,012 kg 4,436 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 888 km 551 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 293 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 | Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 22.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 3,308 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 173 km (108 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 107 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti QX70 3.7 V6
- Is 66 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























