
Infiniti QX50 II
Car comparison
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparison
Infiniti QX50 II

Infiniti QX50 II

Infiniti QX50 II

Infiniti QX50 II
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
| Model | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 408hp304kW+136 hp | 354hp264kW+82 hp | 321hp239kW+49 hp | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 589Nm434lb-ft+209 Nm | 513Nm378lb-ft+133 Nm | 464Nm342lb-ft+84 Nm | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,795kg3,957lb |
| Gross weight | 2,296kg5,062lb | 2,296kg5,062lb | 2,296kg5,062lb | 2,296kg5,062lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.7s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph-14.1 s Calculated | 62.7s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph-9.1 s Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph-6.0 s Calculated | 71.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s-1.4 s | 5.4s-1.0 s | 5.7s-0.6 s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s-11.4 s Calculated | 19.5s-8.3 s Calculated | 22.2s-5.6 s Calculated | 27.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s-1.3 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.4s-0.6 s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.5s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.8s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,693mm185in | 4,693mm185in | 4,693mm185in | 4,693mm185in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,903mm75in | 1,903mm75in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in | 1,679mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in | 2,800mm110in |
| Ground clearance | 218mm9in | 218mm9in | 218mm9in | 218mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 895L | 895L | 895L | 895L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,699L | 1,699L | 1,699L | 1,699L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L | 60L | 60L |
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | 5,600 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | 5,600 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | 5,600 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | 5,600 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.1 s | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 19.5 s | 22.2 s | 27.8 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.8 s | 9.0 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.4 s | 11.7 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s | 13.8 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | 408 hp 304 kW |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | 354 hp 264 kW |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | 321 hp 239 kW |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | 272 hp 203 kW |
Infiniti QX50 II 2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3) 408 hp has 136 hp more than Infiniti QX50 II 2.0 VC-Turbo 272 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti QX50 II 2.0 VC-Turbo 272 hp and Infiniti QX50 II 2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3) 408 hp: 136 hp (101 kW).
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | 589 Nm 434 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | 513 Nm 378 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | 464 Nm 342 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | 4.9 s |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | 5.4 s |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | 5.7 s |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti QX50 II 2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3) 408 hp and Infiniti QX50 II 2.0 VC-Turbo 272 hp: 1.4 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Infiniti QX50 II 2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2) 354 hp and Infiniti QX50 II 2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1) 321 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | 408 hp 304 kW | 4.9 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.4 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Vehicle | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 3)408 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 2)354 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo (Stage 1)321 hp | InfinitiQX50 II2.0 VC-Turbo272 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 408 hp 304 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 589 Nm 434 lb-ft | 513 Nm 378 lb-ft | 464 Nm 342 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 895 L 31.6 cu ft | 895 L 31.6 cu ft | 895 L 31.6 cu ft | 895 L 31.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Pros
No measurable advantages in the available data.























