Infiniti Q50
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful364 hp271 kW
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions159 g/km
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score89/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Best overall score71/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 364hp271kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,853kg4,085lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 62.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,783mm188in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,519mm60in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 510L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 364 hp 271 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 has 24 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 1,853 kg 4,085 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 5.4 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 364 hp 271 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 364 hp 271 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,853 kg 4,085 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
- Has 24 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 52 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 88 kg lighter
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























