Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6vsInfiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

Polestar 2.0 T6

367 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2016-2018
VS

Infiniti Q50

S 3.5 V6

364 hp3498 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSedan2013-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    367 hp
    274 kW
  • Highest torque
    470 Nm
    347 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,676 kg
    3,695 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    219 hp/t
    163 kW/t
    4.6 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100

Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    510 L
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Power
367hp274kW
364hp271kW
Torque
470Nm347lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,676kg3,695lb
1,775kg3,913lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
45.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
49.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
5.1s
0-200 km/h
13.9s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
13.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
865km538mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
3,498cc213cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,783mm188in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,824mm72in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,850mm112in
Front track
1,578mm62in
1,519mm60in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,529mm60in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
510L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
-
CO2 emissions-
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T66,000 rpm3,100-5,100 rpm7,000 rpm
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V66,500 rpm5,200 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
5.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.9 s
15.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
13.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
191 km/h
118 mph
186 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
367 hp
274 kW
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
364 hp
271 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 has 3 hp more than Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
1,676 kg
3,695 lb
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
1,775 kg
3,913 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T64.7 s
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V65.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
367 hp
274 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
364 hp
271 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Power
364 hp
271 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,783 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Power
364 hp
271 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
4.7 s
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
364 hp
271 kW
Torque
470 Nm
347 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,676 kg
3,695 lb
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,783 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
865 km
538 mi
-
CO2 score
-
144 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 99 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6

  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 130 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II Polestar 2.0 T6
Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Polestar 2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
S 3.5 V6
AMG C 450 V6
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 450 V6
Polestar 2.0 T6
R 2.5i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
S 3.5 V6
Polestar 3.0 T6
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 3.0 T6
S 3.5 V6
4.2 BiTDI V8 clean diesel
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)Facelift 20134.2 BiTDI V8 clean diesel
Polestar 2.0 T6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsAUDIS4 (B9)3.0 TFSI V6
S 3.5 V6
4.2 TDI V8 clean diesel
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsAUDIA8 (D4/4H)Facelift 20134.2 TDI V8 clean diesel
Polestar 2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsVolvoS902.0 T6
S 3.5 V6
E 400 V6 3.5
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.5
Polestar 2.0 T6
S 3.0
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsJaguarXE (X760)S 3.0
Polestar 2.0 T6
S 3.0 V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6vsJaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
S 3.5 V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
InfinitiQ50S 3.5 V6vsAUDIS4 (B8)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 vs Infiniti Q50 S 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster