Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6vsInfiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q50
S 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6
- Most powerful405 hp302 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight237 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,676 kg3,695 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 405hp302kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,676kg3,695lb | 1,712kg3,774lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 45.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 47.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 237hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 865km538mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,800mm189in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | - |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 206g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,100-5,100 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 1,600-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 14.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 405 hp 302 kW |
Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6 has 38 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 1,676 kg 3,695 lb |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 1,712 kg 3,774 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 4.7 s |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 5.1 s |
Although Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 and Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 237 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 865 km 538 mi |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 879 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 405 hp 302 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | 237 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 2013Polestar 2.0 T6 | InfinitiQ50S 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 405 hp 302 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,676 kg 3,695 lb | 1,712 kg 3,774 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 865 km 538 mi | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 206 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 237 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6 | Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 Polestar 2.0 T6
- Is 36 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti Q50 S 3.0 V6
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























