Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.2dvsPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 408 II
1.6 THP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,609 km1,000 mi
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score94/100
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 167hp125kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,796kg3,960lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.9s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,609km1,000mi Calculated | 898km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 3,200-4,000 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.9 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d has 3 hp more than Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 8.7 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 8.2 s |
Although Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d has more power, Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d and Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 1,609 km 1,000 mi |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 898 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 167 hp 125 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,609 km 1,000 mi | 898 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d | Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 155 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 710 km (441 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Is 381 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























