Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.2dvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952)
2.2 JTD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Lightest1,374 kg3,029 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.5 L/100 km67.2 mpg US80.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,609 km1,000 mi
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,796kg3,960lb | 1,374kg3,029lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 71.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.9s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,609km1,000mi Calculated | 1,238km769mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,625mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 3,200-4,000 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.9 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d has 20 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,374 kg 3,029 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 8.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 8.4 s |
Although Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d has more power, Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 1,609 km 1,000 mi |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 1,238 km 769 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | 1,374 kg 3,029 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,609 km 1,000 mi | 1,238 km 769 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 371 km (230 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) 2.2 JTD
- Is 422 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























