Car comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.2dvsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017

2.2d

170 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-present
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

163 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Lightest
    1,555 kg
    3,428 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    105 hp/t
    78 kW/t
    9.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    109 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,609 km
    1,000 mi
  • Best performance score
    47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
170hp127kW
163hp122kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,796kg3,960lb
1,555kg3,428lb
Gross weight-
2,190kg4,828lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
80.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
33.9s
Calculated
35.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,609km1,000mi
Calculated
1,341km834mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,810mm189in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,445mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,960mm117in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance-
116mm5in
Trunk volume
450L
505L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
55L
CO2 emissions
123g/km
109g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2dJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d3,200-4,000 rpm1,600-2,800 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.9 s
35.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
170 hp
127 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d has 7 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
1,796 kg
3,960 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,555 kg
3,428 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
230 km/h
143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
227 km/h
141 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d8.7 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.7 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.6 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
1,609 km
1,000 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,341 km
834 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
170 hp
127 kW
8.7 s
230 km/h
143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
8.7 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
8.7 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2d
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.6 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
170 hp
127 kW
163 hp
122 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,796 kg
3,960 lb
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
Fuel consumption
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
4.1 L/100 km
57.4 mpg US
68.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,609 km
1,000 mi
1,341 km
834 mi
CO2 score
123 g/km
109 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
95 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.6 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleInfiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2dJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.05 LC100 km7.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.96 LC100 mi11.55 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used690 L182 US gal152 UK gal615 L162 US gal135 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,208 LC/year1,076 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.2d

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Is 241 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Infiniti Q50 2.2d
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2d
2.0d
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.2d
C 220d
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.2d
2.0d
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.2d
E 220 BlueTEC
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 220 BlueTEC
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.2d
2.0 TDI
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.2d
2.2 JTD
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 JTD
2.2d
2.0 TDI
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.2dvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.2d vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster