Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250vsInfiniti Q50 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q50
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score91/100
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Best estimated range1,231 km765 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | InfinitiQ502.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,617kg3,565lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.4s Calculated | 24.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 862km536mi Calculated | 1,231km765mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,790mm189in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | InfinitiQ502.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.4 s | 24.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250 and Infiniti Q50 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250 and Infiniti Q50 2.0: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 862 km 536 mi |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 1,231 km 765 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ502.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ502.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | InfinitiQ502.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 862 km 536 mi | 1,231 km 765 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250 | Infiniti Q50 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250
- Is 212 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti Q50 2.0
- Has 369 km (229 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























