Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4vsInfiniti Q30 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q30
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
Infiniti Q30 2.0
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | InfinitiQ302.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,476km917mi Calculated | 836km519mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,495mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q30 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | InfinitiQ302.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Infiniti Q30 2.0 has 21 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Infiniti Q30 2.0: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 7.3 s |
Although Infiniti Q30 2.0 has more power, Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Infiniti Q30 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Infiniti Q30 2.0: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 836 km 519 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ302.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ302.0 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | InfinitiQ302.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,476 km 917 mi | 836 km 519 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 | Infiniti Q30 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 640 km (398 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 47 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti Q30 2.0
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 33 kg lighter
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























