Volkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSIvsInfiniti Q30 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q30
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,376 kg3,034 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
Infiniti Q30 2.0
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range836 km519 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | InfinitiQ302.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,376kg3,034lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.9s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 836km519mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,288mm169in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,488mm59in | 1,495mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,524mm99in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,581mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 905L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q30 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | InfinitiQ302.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.9 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI has 9 hp more than Infiniti Q30 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q30 2.0 and Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,376 kg 3,034 lb |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI and Infiniti Q30 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 836 km 519 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ302.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ302.0 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | InfinitiQ302.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,376 kg 3,034 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 836 km 519 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI | Infiniti Q30 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 94 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti Q30 2.0
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























