Volkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSIvsInfiniti Q30 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q30
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,351 kg2,978 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
Infiniti Q30 2.0
- Best estimated range836 km519 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | InfinitiQ302.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,351kg2,978lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 83.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 836km519mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,288mm169in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,488mm59in | 1,495mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,524mm99in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,581mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 905L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q30 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | InfinitiQ302.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI has 9 hp more than Infiniti Q30 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Infiniti Q30 2.0 and Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,351 kg 2,978 lb |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI and Infiniti Q30 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 836 km 519 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ302.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ302.0 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ302.0 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | InfinitiQ302.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,351 kg 2,978 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 836 km 519 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI | Infiniti Q30 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 119 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti Q30 2.0
- Has 2 km (2 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























