Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 3.3 MPivsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score88/100
Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful270 hp201 kW
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,680 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 270hp201kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 318Nm235lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,758kg3,876lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.8s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,342cc204cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,700mm185in | 4,746mm187in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,680mm66in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,633mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,644mm65in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 1,680L | 650L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 245g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 6,400 rpm | 5,300 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.8 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 270 hp 201 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 250 hp 186 kW |
Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi has 20 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 318 Nm 235 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 1,758 kg 3,876 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 8.5 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 6.8 s |
Although Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 270 hp 201 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi | JaguarF-Pace2.0t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 270 hp 201 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 318 Nm 235 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,758 kg 3,876 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 245 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,680 L 59.3 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 3.3 MPi
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1,030 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Has 47 Nm more
- Is 48 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 82 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























