Hyundai Kona II
Car comparison
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIvsNissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024
1.3 DIG-T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T
- Most powerful158 hp118 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Largest trunk504 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed201 km/h125 mph
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best performance score40/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 158hp118kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.5s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 197 km/h / 122 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 98.5s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 712km442mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,585mm62in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,665mm105in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,596mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 170mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 466L | 504L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,300L | 1,447L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
- Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 98.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 136 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 158 hp 118 kW |
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T has 8 hp more than Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 199 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 8.9 s |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 9.2 s |
Although Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T has more power, Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 712 km 442 mi |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 158 hp 118 kW | 9.2 s | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 158 hp 118 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 712 km 442 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI | Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 147 km (91 mi) more estimated range
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























