Hongqi HS5
Car comparison
Hongqi HS5 2.0T · Stage 3vsHongqi HS5 2.0T · Stage 2vsHongqi HS5 2.0T · Stage 1vsHongqi HS5 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi HS5
2.0T (Stage 2)
Hongqi HS5
2.0T (Stage 1)
Hongqi HS5
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 3) 336 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful336 hp251 kW
- Highest torque527 Nm389 lb-ft
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range762 km473 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | HongqiHS52.0T224 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 336hp251kW+112 hp | 291hp217kW+67 hp | 264hp197kW+40 hp | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 527Nm389lb-ft+187 Nm | 459Nm339lb-ft+119 Nm | 415Nm306lb-ft+75 Nm | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Gross weight | 2,255kg4,971lb | 2,255kg4,971lb | 2,255kg4,971lb | 2,255kg4,971lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph-10.0 s Calculated | 81.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph-4.1 s Calculated | 85.5s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph-0.1 s Calculated | 85.5s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s-1.9 s | 7.4s-1.3 s | 7.9s-0.8 s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s-44.5 s Calculated | 32.3s-38.6 s Calculated | 37.5s-33.4 s Calculated | 70.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s-1.8 s Calculated | 7.0s-1.2 s Calculated | 7.4s-0.8 s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 15.3s-1.0 s Calculated | 15.7s-0.6 s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 762km473mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,989cc121cu in | 1,989cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,760mm187in | 4,760mm187in | 4,760mm187in | 4,760mm187in |
| Width | 1,907mm75in | 1,907mm75in | 1,907mm75in | 1,907mm75in |
| Height | 1,700mm67in | 1,700mm67in | 1,700mm67in | 1,700mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,870mm113in | 2,870mm113in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,630mm64in | 1,630mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,630mm64in | 1,630mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L | 64L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | HongqiHS52.0T224 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.0 s | 7.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.4 s | 7.9 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 32.3 s | 37.5 s | 70.9 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s | 13.2 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s | 15.7 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 336 hp 251 kW |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 291 hp 217 kW |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 264 hp 197 kW |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 224 hp 167 kW |
Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 3) 336 hp has 112 hp more than Hongqi HS5 2.0T 224 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Hongqi HS5 2.0T 224 hp and Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 3) 336 hp: 112 hp (84 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 527 Nm 389 lb-ft |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 459 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 415 Nm 306 lb-ft |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 6.8 s |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 7.4 s |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 7.9 s |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 3) 336 hp and Hongqi HS5 2.0T 224 hp: 1.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 2) 291 hp and Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 1) 264 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 762 km 473 mi |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 762 km 473 mi |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 762 km 473 mi |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 762 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 336 hp 251 kW | 6.8 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 291 hp 217 kW | 7.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 264 hp 197 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 224 hp 167 kW | 8.7 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 3) 336 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 3)336 hp | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 2)291 hp | HongqiHS52.0T (Stage 1)264 hp | HongqiHS52.0T224 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 336 hp 251 kW | 291 hp 217 kW | 264 hp 197 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 527 Nm 389 lb-ft | 459 Nm 339 lb-ft | 415 Nm 306 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.4 s | 7.9 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 762 km 473 mi | 762 km 473 mi | 762 km 473 mi | 762 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 3) 336 hp | Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 2) 291 hp | Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 1) 264 hp | Hongqi HS5 2.0T 224 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 3) 336 hp
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Hongqi HS5 2.0T (Stage 2) 291 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























