Car comparison

Hongqi HS5 2.0TvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hongqi HS5

2.0T

224 hp1989 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS

Volkswagen Teramont

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Hongqi HS5 2.0T

  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    224 hp
    167 kW
  • Lightest
    1,805 kg
    3,979 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    124 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    762 km
    473 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHongqiHS52.0TVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
224hp167kW
220hp164kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,805kg3,979lb
2,060kg4,542lb
Gross weight
2,255kg4,971lb
2,670kg5,886lb
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
To 99% top speed
85.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
82.8s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
70.8s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
762km473mi
Calculated
745km463mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,989cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,760mm187in
5,036mm198in
Width
1,907mm75in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,700mm67in
1,769mm70in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,979mm117in
Front track
1,630mm64in
-
Rear track
1,630mm64in
-
Ground clearance-
203mm8in
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
70L
CO2 emissions-
221g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHongqiHS52.0TVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
70.8 s
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
135 km/h
84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
224 hp
167 kW
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW

Hongqi HS5 2.0T has 4 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI and Hongqi HS5 2.0T: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
2,060 kg
4,542 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
204 km/h
127 mph
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
190 km/h
118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T8.7 s
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI8.6 s

Although Hongqi HS5 2.0T has more power, Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI and Hongqi HS5 2.0T: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hongqi HS5 2.0T and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
762 km
473 mi
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
745 km
463 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HongqiHS52.0T
224 hp
167 kW
8.7 s
204 km/h
127 mph
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
8.6 s
190 km/h
118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HongqiHS52.0T
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,760 mm
187.4 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HongqiHS52.0T
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Hongqi HS5 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HongqiHS52.0T
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.7 s
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HongqiHS52.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHongqiHS52.0TVolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI
Power
224 hp
167 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.6 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Lightness
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
2,060 kg
4,542 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,760 mm
187.4 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in
Range score
762 km
473 mi
745 km
463 mi
CO2 score
-
221 g/km
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHongqi HS5 2.0TVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Hongqi HS5 2.0T

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 255 kg lighter
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Hongqi HS5 2.0T
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0T
380TSI
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
2.0T
380 TSI
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsVolkswagenTalagon380 TSI
2.0 TSI
450TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2.0T
650T
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0T
40 TFSI
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsAUDIQ640 TFSI
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTavendor380TSI
2.0 TSI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0T
2.2 CRDi
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0T
2.0i
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 TSI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Hongqi HS5 2.0T vs Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster