Car comparison

Hongqi HS5 2.0TvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hongqi HS5

2.0T

224 hp1989 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Hongqi HS5 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    224 hp
    167 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    836 km
    520 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHongqiHS52.0TMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
224hp167kW
186hp139kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,805kg3,979lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
2,255kg4,971lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
85.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
77.6s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
70.8s
Calculated
64.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
762km473mi
Calculated
836km520mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,989cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,760mm187in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,907mm75in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,700mm67in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,630mm64in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,630mm64in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance-
180mm7in
Trunk volume-
430L
Max trunk volume-
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
64L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHongqiHS52.0TMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
70.8 s
64.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
224 hp
167 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Hongqi HS5 2.0T has 38 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Hongqi HS5 2.0T: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T8.7 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.7 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Hongqi HS5 2.0T: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS52.0T
762 km
473 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
836 km
520 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HongqiHS52.0T
224 hp
167 kW
8.7 s
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.7 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HongqiHS52.0T
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,760 mm
187.4 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HongqiHS52.0T
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Hongqi HS5 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HongqiHS52.0T
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.7 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HongqiHS52.0T
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHongqiHS52.0TMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
224 hp
167 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,760 mm
187.4 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
762 km
473 mi
836 km
520 mi
Trunk score
-
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHongqi HS5 2.0TMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Hongqi HS5 2.0T

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Is 315 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Hongqi HS5 2.0T
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0T
380TSI
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0T
380 TSI
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsVolkswagenTalagon380 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0T
650T
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0T
40 TFSI
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsAUDIQ640 TFSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0T
380TSI
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsVolkswagenTavendor380TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0T
2.2 CRDi
VS
HongqiHS52.0TvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
Hongqi HS5 2.0T vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster