Cadillac GT4
Car comparison
Cadillac GT4 25TvsHongqi HS5 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi HS5
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hongqi HS5 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacGT425T | HongqiHS52.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,255kg4,971lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 85.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 63.0s Calculated | 70.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,989cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,633mm182in | 4,760mm187in |
| Width | 1,878mm74in | 1,907mm75in |
| Height | 1,536mm60in | 1,700mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 131mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 289L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacGT425T | HongqiHS52.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 63.0 s | 70.8 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 224 hp 167 kW |
Hongqi HS5 2.0T has 13 hp more than Cadillac GT4 25T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and Hongqi HS5 2.0T: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 8.8 s |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hongqi HS5 2.0T and Cadillac GT4 25T: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 25T and Hongqi HS5 2.0T: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 882 km 548 mi |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 762 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 211 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 224 hp 167 kW | 8.7 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiHS52.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| HongqiHS52.0T |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Hongqi HS5 2.0T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT425T | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| HongqiHS52.0T | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacGT425T | HongqiHS52.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 762 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 289 L 10.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac GT4 25T | Hongqi HS5 2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac GT4 25T
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 km (75 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Hongqi HS5 2.0T
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























