Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsHongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Hongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023

2.0T

252 hp1989 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Lightest
    1,755 kg
    3,869 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DHongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Power
254hp189kW
252hp188kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
1,755kg3,869lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
77.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
41.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32mpg US38.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
872km542mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,989cc121cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
4,785mm188in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,905mm75in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,700mm67in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,623mm64in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
258L
-
Max trunk volume
1,971L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
74L
64L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DHongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T5,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DHongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
41.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
252 hp
188 kW

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 2 hp more than Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
1,755 kg
3,869 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T7.6 s

Although Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
872 km
542 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
252 hp
188 kW
7.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,785 mm
188.4 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DHongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
252 hp
188 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.0 mpg US
38.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,785 mm
188.4 in
Height
1,700 mm
66.9 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
872 km
542 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DHongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32 mpg US38.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km12.84 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi20.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,101 L291 US gal242 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,927 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 170 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 404 km (251 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Hongqi HS5 Facelift 2023 2.0T

  • Is 381 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Hongqi HS5 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0T
28T
VS
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0TvsCadillacGT428T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0T
2.0i
VS
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0TvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0TvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0TvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0T
45 TDI V6
VS
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0TvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
450TSI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2.0T
2.0i
VS
HongqiHS5Facelift 20232.0TvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Hongqi HS5 · Facelift 2023 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster