Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500vsHonda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda S2000 (AP1)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Best estimated range534 km332 mi
- Largest trunk276 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 208Nm153lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,270kg2,800lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 79.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 23.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 534km332mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,966cc303cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,135mm163in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,413mm56in | 1,270mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,470mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 129mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 276L | 143L |
| Max trunk volume | 390L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 235g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: Power / Torque
- Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 5,600 rpm | 2,700-4,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 8,300 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 23.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 has 66 hp more than Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: 66 hp (49 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 6.2 s |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 6.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 534 km 332 mi |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 534 km 332 mi | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 235 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | 143 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 | Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Has 66 hp more
- Has 252 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Is 440 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























