Honda Civic X Sedan
Car comparison
Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTECvsVolvo S90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,246 kg2,747 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions130 g/km
- Largest trunk519 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best estimated range821 km510 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 182hp136kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,246kg2,747lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.9s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 807km501mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,648mm183in | 4,963mm195in |
| Width | 1,799mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,698mm106in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 519L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 46L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 130g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC: Power / Torque
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 5,500 rpm | 1,900-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.9 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 182 hp 136 kW |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has 8 hp more than Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 1,246 kg 2,747 lb |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 8.1 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
Although Volvo S90 2.0 T4 has more power, Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 807 km 501 mi |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | VolvoS902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 182 hp 136 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,246 kg 2,747 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 807 km 501 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 130 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 519 L 18.3 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC
- Is 585 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 19 L more trunk volume
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























