Car comparison

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0vsRenault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Honda Civic Type R (FN2)

2.0

201 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2007-2011
VS

Renault Clio III (PHASE II)

RS 2.0 16V

201 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V

  • Highest torque
    215 Nm
    159 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,204 kg
    2,654 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    167 hp/t
    124 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    671 km
    417 mi
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    201 hp
    150 kW
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    67/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
201hp150kW
201hp150kW
Torque
193Nm142lb-ft
215Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,267kg2,793lb
1,204kg2,654lb
Gross weight
1,700kg3,748lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
71.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
73.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
26.5s
Calculated
31.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton
Calculated
179Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
549km341mi
Calculated
671km417mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,276mm168in
4,017mm158in
Width
1,785mm70in
1,769mm70in
Height
1,445mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,635mm104in
2,585mm102in
Front track
1,505mm59in
1,520mm60in
Rear track
1,530mm60in
1,520mm60in
Ground clearance-
120mm5in
Trunk volume
485L
288L
Max trunk volume
1,352L
1,038L
Doors
3
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
50L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16VPowerTorque
  • Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.07,800 rpm5,600 rpm8,050 rpm
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V7,100 rpm5,400 rpm7,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.5 s
31.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
201 hp
150 kW
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
201 hp
150 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
193 Nm
142 lb-ft
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
215 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
1,267 kg
2,793 lb
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
1,204 kg
2,654 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.06.6 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 and Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
549 km
341 mi
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
671 km
417 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
201 hp
150 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
201 hp
150 kW
6.9 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,276 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,017 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.6 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
201 hp
150 kW
201 hp
150 kW
Torque
193 Nm
142 lb-ft
215 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
6.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,267 kg
2,793 lb
1,204 kg
2,654 lb
Fuel consumption
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,276 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,017 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
549 km
341 mi
671 km
417 mi
Trunk score
485 L
17.1 cu ft
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHonda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 197 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V

  • Has 22 Nm more
  • Is 63 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 121 km (75 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0
RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0
RS 2.0 16V
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0
RS 2.0 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0vsAUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 vs Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster