Car comparison

Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0vsSkoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Honda Civic Type R (FL5)

2.0

329 hp1996 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2023-present
VS

Skoda Superb IV

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    285 km/h
    177 mph Unrestricted
    275 km/h
    171 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    329 hp
    245 kW
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,405 kg
    3,097 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    234 hp/t
    175 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    72/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    825 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    645 L
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
329hp245kW
265hp198kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,405kg3,097lb
1,781kg3,926lb
Gross weight
1,800kg3,968lb
2,300kg5,071lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
87.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
100.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.4s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
18.2s
Calculated
23.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.5s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
580km361mi
Calculated
825km513mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,996cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,594mm181in
4,912mm193in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,849mm73in
Height
1,401mm55in
1,481mm58in
Wheelbase
2,734mm108in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,625mm64in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,623mm64in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance-
138mm5in
Trunk volume
410L
645L
Max trunk volume
1,212L
1,795L
Doors
5
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
47L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.06,500 rpm2,600-4,000 rpm7,000 rpm
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.4 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.2 s
23.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.4 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.5 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
174 km/h
108 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
329 hp
245 kW
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW

Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 has 64 hp more than Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI and Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0: 64 hp (48 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
1,781 kg
3,926 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.05.4 s
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI5.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 and Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
580 km
361 mi
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
825 km
513 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
329 hp
245 kW
5.4 s
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
Power
329 hp
245 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
4 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,594 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,401 mm
55.2 in
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,912 mm
193.4 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
Power
329 hp
245 kW
0-100 km/h5.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
5.4 s
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
329 hp
245 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.4 s
5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
1,781 kg
3,926 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
4 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,594 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,401 mm
55.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,912 mm
193.4 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Range score
580 km
361 mi
825 km
513 mi
Trunk score
410 L
14.5 cu ft
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
234 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHonda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0

  • Has 64 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 376 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 85 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 245 km (152 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 235 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK8)Facelift 20202.0
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201945 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (EP3)Facelift 20032.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0
2.0 TSI
76 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIE5 Sportback76 kWh
2.0
2.0
VS
HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0vsHondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0
2.0 TSI
83 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Sportback e-tron (GH)83 kWh
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 vs Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster