Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsHonda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011
2.4 i-VTEC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
- Largest trunk464 L
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 234Nm173lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | - |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 31.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 149Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 756km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,354cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,725mm186in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,705mm106in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 464L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 7,000 rpm | 4,300-4,400 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 31.3 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 201 hp 150 kW |
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 234 Nm 173 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 756 km 470 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 201 hp 150 kW | 8.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 234 Nm 173 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 756 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI | Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 86 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 259 km (161 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























