Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20VvsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,614 kg3,558 lb
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,614kg3,558lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,606mm181in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5,500 rpm | 1,950-5,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,200 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW |
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has 6 hp more than Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5.7 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
Although Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has more power, Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Is 26 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























