Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 220vsGeely Coolray · Facelift 2023 1.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonGeely Coolray · Facelift 2023
1.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km37.0 mpg US44.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range709 km440 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 181hp135kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 290Nm214lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.3s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.9s Calculated | 44.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km37mpg US44.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km391mi Calculated | 709km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,609mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220: Power / Torque
- Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.9 s | 44.0 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 181 hp 135 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 has 9 hp more than Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T.
The biggest power difference is between Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 7.6 s |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 7.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 630 km 391 mi |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 709 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 181 hp 135 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T |
| 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 181 hp 135 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 391 mi | 709 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 | Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km37 mpg US44.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 11.11 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 17.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 953 L252 US gal210 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,667 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























