Volkswagen Tayron II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSIvsGeely Coolray · Facelift 2023 1.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonGeely Coolray · Facelift 2023
1.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range9,000 km5,592 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T
- Most powerful181 hp135 kW
- Highest torque290 Nm214 lb-ft
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 181hp135kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 290Nm214lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,873kg4,129lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.5s Calculated | 44.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km37mpg US44.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated | 709km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,866mm73in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,609mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,789mm110in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,579mm62in | 1,557mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 705L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,915L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.5 s | 44.0 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 181 hp 135 kW |
Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T has 4 hp more than Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI and Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 1,873 kg 4,129 lb |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 7.6 s |
Although Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T has more power, Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI and Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI and Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T: 5.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 95 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 709 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 181 hp 135 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T |
| 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 95 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | GeelyCoolrayFacelift 20231.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 181 hp 135 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,873 kg 4,129 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 37.0 mpg US 44.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | 709 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 705 L 24.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI | Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km37 mpg US44.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 0.88 LC100 km | 11.11 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi | 17.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal | 953 L252 US gal210 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 131.25 LC/year | 1,667 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8,291 km (5,152 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Geely Coolray Facelift 2023 1.5T
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 523 kg lighter
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























