Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T6

306 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Ford Taurus VII

EcoBoost 325 V6

329 hp2694 ccGasolineFWDManualTwin-turboSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,660 kg
    3,660 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    184 hp/t
    137 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    978 km
    608 mi
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
Power
306hp228kW
329hp245kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
475Nm350lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
58.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
60.8s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
18.2s
Calculated
24.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
978km608mi
Calculated
696km432mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,694cc164cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,996mm197in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,878mm74in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,503mm59in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,949mm116in
Front track
1,578mm62in
1,608mm63in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
133mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
534L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
64L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T65,700 rpm2,100-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V65,500 rpm2,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.2 s
24.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
162 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
306 hp
228 kW
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
329 hp
245 kW

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 has 23 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 23 hp (17 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
475 Nm
350 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
978 km
608 mi
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
696 km
432 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
306 hp
228 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
329 hp
245 kW
6.9 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
Power
329 hp
245 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
Power
329 hp
245 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.9 s
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
329 hp
245 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
475 Nm
350 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,996 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,503 mm
59.2 in
Range score
978 km
608 mi
696 km
432 mi
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
534 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6

  • Is 215 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 283 km (176 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6

  • Has 23 hp more
  • Has 75 Nm more
  • Has 154 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T6
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 vs Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster