Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 325 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range978 km608 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score88/100
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
- Most powerful329 hp245 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Largest trunk534 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 329hp245kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.8s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.2s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 978km608mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,694cc164cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,100-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.2 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 329 hp 245 kW |
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 has 23 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 6.9 s |
Although Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 978 km 608 mi |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 329 hp 245 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 329 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 978 km 608 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 283 km (176 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Has 154 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























