Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 325 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,865 kg4,112 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range816 km507 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 329hp245kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.8s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 816km507mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,694cc164cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 234g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 329 hp 245 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 has 11 hp more than Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6.4 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 816 km 507 mi |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 329 hp 245 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 329 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 816 km 507 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 234 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 121 km (75 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
- Has 25 Nm more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























