Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 325 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 329hp245kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.8s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 175hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 879km546mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,694cc164cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 211g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 329 hp 245 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 has 11 hp more than Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 5.9 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 879 km 546 mi |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 329 hp 245 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 325 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 329 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 879 km 546 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 211 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 183 km (114 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 325 V6
- Has 25 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























