Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

3.0d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T6

306 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,200 km
    746 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
300hp224kW
306hp228kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,750kg3,858lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
2,350kg5,181lb
2,180kg4,806lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
58.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
19.0s
Calculated
18.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,200km746mi
Calculated
978km608mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,578mm62in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
505L
380L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
68L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V64,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T65,700 rpm2,100-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.0 s
18.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
107 mph
175 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
306 hp
228 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 has 6 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V66.2 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T65.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
1,200 km
746 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
978 km
608 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
306 hp
228 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.2 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
306 hp
228 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,200 km
746 mi
978 km
608 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
171 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6

  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 222 km (138 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 125 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 90 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS60 II3.0 T6
3.0d V6
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
2.0 T6
R 2.5i 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
3.0d V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsVolvoS902.0 T6
3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T6
3.0d V6
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
3.0d V6
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 T6
2.0
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
2.0 T6
2.0
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0 T6
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6vsAUDIS3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0d V6 vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster