Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 245
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range971 km603 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score89/100
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Largest trunk534 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,794kg3,955lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,169kg4,782lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.4s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 971km603mi Calculated | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.4 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 5.9 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 2.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 971 km 603 mi |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 780 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 971 km 603 mi | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 339 kg lighter
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 42 km/h (26 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























