WEY Coffee 02
Car comparison
WEY Coffee 02 2.0TvsFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
WEY Coffee 02 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,358 kg2,994 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | WEYCoffee 022.0T | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201hp150kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,358kg2,994lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.6s Calculated | 27.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 11,000km6,835mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,668mm184in | 4,226mm166in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,730mm68in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,588mm102in |
| Ground clearance | - | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- WEY Coffee 02 2.0T: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 6,000-6,300 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WEYCoffee 022.0T | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.6 s | 27.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 201 hp 150 kW |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 200 hp 149 kW |
WEY Coffee 02 2.0T has 1 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and WEY Coffee 02 2.0T: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 6.6 s |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between WEY Coffee 02 2.0T and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between WEY Coffee 02 2.0T and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 5.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 201 hp 150 kW | 6.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| WEYCoffee 022.0T | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WEYCoffee 022.0T | FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp 150 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 11,000 km 6,835 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | WEY Coffee 02 2.0T | Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 0.88 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 131.25 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
WEY Coffee 02 2.0T
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
- Is 742 kg lighter
- Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























