Car comparison

WEY Coffee 02 2.0TvsFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

WEY Coffee 02

2.0T

201 hp1998 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS
200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

WEY Coffee 02 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    201 hp
    150 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    0.5 L/100 km
    470.4 mpg US
    565.0 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelWEYCoffee 022.0TFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
201hp150kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
2,100kg4,630lb
1,358kg2,994lb
Gross weight
2,550kg5,622lb
1,815kg4,001lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
86.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
31.6s
Calculated
27.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
11,000km6,835mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,496cc91cu in
Length
4,668mm184in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,730mm68in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,745mm108in
2,588mm102in
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume-
456L
Max trunk volume-
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

WEY Coffee 02 2.0TFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • WEY Coffee 02 2.0T: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
WEYCoffee 022.0T6,000-6,300 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,550 rpm
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricWEYCoffee 022.0TFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.6 s
27.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEYCoffee 022.0T
201 hp
150 kW
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW

WEY Coffee 02 2.0T has 1 hp more than Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and WEY Coffee 02 2.0T: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEYCoffee 022.0T
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEYCoffee 022.0T
2,100 kg
4,630 lb
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
1,358 kg
2,994 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEYCoffee 022.0T
230 km/h
143 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEYCoffee 022.0T6.6 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost6.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between WEY Coffee 02 2.0T and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEYCoffee 022.0T
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between WEY Coffee 02 2.0T and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 5.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEYCoffee 022.0T
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
WEYCoffee 022.0T
201 hp
150 kW
6.6 s
230 km/h
143 mph
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200 hp
149 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
WEYCoffee 022.0T
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,668 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,730 mm
68.1 in
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
WEYCoffee 022.0T
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
WEYCoffee 022.0T
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
6.6 s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
WEYCoffee 022.0T
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleWEYCoffee 022.0TFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
Power
201 hp
150 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
2,100 kg
4,630 lb
1,358 kg
2,994 lb
Fuel consumption
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,668 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,730 mm
68.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Range score
11,000 km
6,835 mi
-
Trunk score
-
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleWEY Coffee 02 2.0TFord Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km0.88 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi1.41 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used75 L20 US gal16 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost131.25 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

WEY Coffee 02 2.0T

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 5.5 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

  • Is 742 kg lighter
  • Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
WEY Coffee 02 2.0T
Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

WEY Coffee 02 2.0T vs Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster