Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43vsFord Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VII
GT 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8
- Most powerful446 hp333 kW
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lightest1,761 kg3,882 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t189 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 421hp314kW | 446hp333kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 1,761kg3,882lb |
| Gross weight | 2,535kg5,589lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 64.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 16.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t164kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 608km378mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 4,810mm189in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,603mm63in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,888mm114in | 2,719mm107in |
| Front track | 1,666mm66in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,666mm66in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 545L | 381L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,490L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 6,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 5,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 16.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW |
Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8 has 25 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43 and Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 1,761 kg 3,882 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 4.8 s |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
Although Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43 and Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43 and Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 421 hp 314 kW | 446 hp 333 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | 1,761 kg 3,882 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 608 km 378 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43 | Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 164 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 159 kg lighter
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























