Ford Mustang VII
Car comparison
Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8vsFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
GT/CS 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Lightest1,669 kg3,680 lb
- Best power-to-weight270 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk408 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score62/100
Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 446hp333kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,761kg3,882lb | 1,669kg3,680lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 58.3s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s Calculated | 17.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 466km289mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,038cc307cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,789mm189in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,382mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,719mm107in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,642mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 381L | 408L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 5,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 has 4 hp more than Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8 and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 1,761 kg 3,882 lb |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,669 kg 3,680 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8 and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang VIIGT 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 446 hp 333 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,761 kg 3,882 lb | 1,669 kg 3,680 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 466 km 289 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 381 L 13.5 cu ft | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8 | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang VII GT 5.0 V8
- Has 11 Nm more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 92 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























